FORUM

Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

Rebalance Question Options
stevenoshea
Posted: Saturday, December 19, 2009 9:10:09 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/10/2009
Posts: 5
Points: 15
Location: Woodland
I am sorry if this has been asked somewhere before, but if you execute a move that causes you to rebalance (i.e. has the (r) in the maneuver) how are you able to access maneuvers on the opposite side. For example: Arrowheart Style, Called Shot: Held Item causes a rebalance (r), so how does on ever execute the Called Shot: Head ?

Thanks.

Steven
MacLeod
Posted: Saturday, December 19, 2009 10:02:00 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/8/2009
Posts: 128
Points: 287
Location: Michigan
You can move across each row/column like a Rook on a Chess board. So from Aim and Breathe you could then perform Called Shot: Torso, Arm, Held Item OR Head. Thing is, you can't go for multiple Called Shots in a row because it requires too much precision.

/*~Matthew Miller~*\
stevenoshea
Posted: Saturday, December 19, 2009 10:08:04 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/10/2009
Posts: 5
Points: 15
Location: Woodland
OH! For some reason, I thought you could only move I space at a time. That will make a huge difference. Thank you.
MacLeod
Posted: Saturday, December 19, 2009 10:09:53 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/8/2009
Posts: 128
Points: 287
Location: Michigan
No problem. I made the same mistake when I first read the game over. Its a pretty crucial piece of information, to say the least. :)

/*~Matthew Miller~*\
stevenoshea
Posted: Monday, December 21, 2009 7:23:27 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/10/2009
Posts: 5
Points: 15
Location: Woodland
I went back and reread the rules and they are actually quite clear. If a rook in chess could get there, then so can you. I thought it might need clarification, but it was all my misunderstanding. I'm looking forward to trying this out.
stevenoshea
Posted: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 9:55:55 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/10/2009
Posts: 5
Points: 15
Location: Woodland
One other question if I may. . . In the rules it says (regarding the combat style sheets) that if an effect is listed but no damage is listed, then only the effect takes place. So what good is the "Cleave" maneuver on the Free Sword Style? (d4/d2; Atk. 2 Tgts) There is an effect listed, but no damage. It is the same with the "Sweep" maneuver on the Great Weapon Style. (d10/d6; 5 targets) So again, there is an effect with no damage listed.

Seems to me that a "Cleave" and a "Sweep" should at least be listed as "1 + # Targets"

Any thoughts?
MadLordOfMilk
Posted: Saturday, January 02, 2010 7:25:36 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/22/2009
Posts: 74
Points: 222
Location: Western NY, USA
stevenoshea wrote:
One other question if I may. . . In the rules it says (regarding the combat style sheets) that if an effect is listed but no damage is listed, then only the effect takes place. So what good is the "Cleave" maneuver on the Free Sword Style? (d4/d2; Atk. 2 Tgts) There is an effect listed, but no damage. It is the same with the "Sweep" maneuver on the Great Weapon Style. (d10/d6; 5 targets) So again, there is an effect with no damage listed.

Seems to me that a "Cleave" and a "Sweep" should at least be listed as "1 + # Targets"

Any thoughts?
It's meant as 1dmg against that many targets. Multiple targets isn't exactly an effect :)

Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Spellbound Kingdoms theme based on SoClean Theme Created by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko). Spellbound Kingdoms styles by Quire Graphics
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.2 (NET v2.0) - 9/27/2007
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.
This page was generated in 0.104 seconds.